header-logo header-logo

28 April 2010
Categories: In-House , Legal News
printer mail-detail

In-house counsel on the rise

Law firms need to reassess their working methods to meet the expectations of in-house counsel, according to new research.

The Winmark Looking Glass Report 2010, The Legal World on its Future, says in-house counsel have grown in terms of number, role and status despite the recession and asks how law firms can match their expectations on fees, service delivery and commercial influence.

According to the report, based on research among top law firms and general counsel, companies are reallocating their legal budget to keep more legal spend in-house. On fees, general counsel “crave simplicity, clarity and predictability”, and law firms need to show a clearer link between what they cost their clients and the value they create.

Although the hourly rate is in declining use, 85% of general counsel say they still frequently use it. However, they would like to see more opportunities to negotiate value-based and results-based fees.

Despite the recession, a third of law firms have increased their IT spend and a quarter have boosted their marketing budgets. Marketing budgets are reallocating from traditional events such as hospitality to web and digital marketing.

While firms have been cutting headcount during the tough economic times, they will need to ensure they have enough commercial lawyers in place for the future. According to the report, clients will not put up with inflated salaries caused by lack of resources.

Sandie Okoro, general counsel, Barings Asset Management, says: “The legal profession faces a significant change in the coming years and it is becoming evident that the way to meet the associated challenges is not in isolation, but with both in-house and private practice working in genuine partnership.”

John Jeffcock, CEO of Winmark Ltd, says: “Our research shows that changes in the legal sector have spread faster than thought. The legal profession needs a better common script if it is to operate effectively in that changed environment.”
 

Categories: In-House , Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll