header-logo header-logo

28 April 2010
Categories: In-House , Legal News
printer mail-detail

In-house counsel on the rise

Law firms need to reassess their working methods to meet the expectations of in-house counsel, according to new research.

The Winmark Looking Glass Report 2010, The Legal World on its Future, says in-house counsel have grown in terms of number, role and status despite the recession and asks how law firms can match their expectations on fees, service delivery and commercial influence.

According to the report, based on research among top law firms and general counsel, companies are reallocating their legal budget to keep more legal spend in-house. On fees, general counsel “crave simplicity, clarity and predictability”, and law firms need to show a clearer link between what they cost their clients and the value they create.

Although the hourly rate is in declining use, 85% of general counsel say they still frequently use it. However, they would like to see more opportunities to negotiate value-based and results-based fees.

Despite the recession, a third of law firms have increased their IT spend and a quarter have boosted their marketing budgets. Marketing budgets are reallocating from traditional events such as hospitality to web and digital marketing.

While firms have been cutting headcount during the tough economic times, they will need to ensure they have enough commercial lawyers in place for the future. According to the report, clients will not put up with inflated salaries caused by lack of resources.

Sandie Okoro, general counsel, Barings Asset Management, says: “The legal profession faces a significant change in the coming years and it is becoming evident that the way to meet the associated challenges is not in isolation, but with both in-house and private practice working in genuine partnership.”

John Jeffcock, CEO of Winmark Ltd, says: “Our research shows that changes in the legal sector have spread faster than thought. The legal profession needs a better common script if it is to operate effectively in that changed environment.”
 

Categories: In-House , Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ling Ong, London Market FOIL

NLJ Career Profile: Ling Ong, London Market FOIL

Ling Ong, partner at Weightmans and president of London Market FOIL, discusses her biggest inspirations, the challenges of AI and the importance of tackling unconscious bias

DWF—Imogen Francis

DWF—Imogen Francis

Director and head of IP team joins in Birmingham

Penningtons Manches Cooper—five promotions

Penningtons Manches Cooper—five promotions

Firm boosts partnership and costs practice with five senior promotions

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll