header-logo header-logo

In-house counsel on the rise

28 April 2010
Categories: In-House , Legal News
printer mail-detail

Law firms need to reassess their working methods to meet the expectations of in-house counsel, according to new research.

The Winmark Looking Glass Report 2010, The Legal World on its Future, says in-house counsel have grown in terms of number, role and status despite the recession and asks how law firms can match their expectations on fees, service delivery and commercial influence.

According to the report, based on research among top law firms and general counsel, companies are reallocating their legal budget to keep more legal spend in-house. On fees, general counsel “crave simplicity, clarity and predictability”, and law firms need to show a clearer link between what they cost their clients and the value they create.

Although the hourly rate is in declining use, 85% of general counsel say they still frequently use it. However, they would like to see more opportunities to negotiate value-based and results-based fees.

Despite the recession, a third of law firms have increased their IT spend and a quarter have boosted their marketing budgets. Marketing budgets are reallocating from traditional events such as hospitality to web and digital marketing.

While firms have been cutting headcount during the tough economic times, they will need to ensure they have enough commercial lawyers in place for the future. According to the report, clients will not put up with inflated salaries caused by lack of resources.

Sandie Okoro, general counsel, Barings Asset Management, says: “The legal profession faces a significant change in the coming years and it is becoming evident that the way to meet the associated challenges is not in isolation, but with both in-house and private practice working in genuine partnership.”

John Jeffcock, CEO of Winmark Ltd, says: “Our research shows that changes in the legal sector have spread faster than thought. The legal profession needs a better common script if it is to operate effectively in that changed environment.”
 

Categories: In-House , Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll