header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Divorce meets digital wealth

28 November 2025
Issue: 8141 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Crypto , Family , Technology , Disclosure
printer mail-detail
237027
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure

Non-disclosure may amount to material nondisclosure, as seen in Sharland v Sharland and Gohil v Gohil. Even when traced, values can swing 30% before hearing, and recipients may never gain access without wallet keys or overseas co-operation.

The forthcoming Property (Digital Assets etc) Bill will classify such holdings as a third form of property, providing long-awaited legal clarity. Until then, practitioners must ask sharper questions, seek forensic help and train to spot concealed tokens.

As Webster concludes, family lawyers who understand blockchain’s mechanics will best secure fair outcomes in an era of digital wealth.

Issue: 8141 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Crypto , Family , Technology , Disclosure
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll