header-logo header-logo

28 November 2025 / Robert Webster
Issue: 8141 / Categories: Opinion , Crypto , Family , Divorce , Technology , Disclosure
printer mail-detail

Dividing digital assets

237027
Cryptocurrency is changing the face of divorce finances, says Robert Webster

For decades, family lawyers have dealt with a vast range of assets, from property and pensions to jewellery and pets, but now there’s something new to consider—cryptocurrency. Once a rare occurrence, digital assets are becoming increasingly prevalent in high-net-worth financial remedy cases, raising the question of whether practitioners and the law are prepared for disputes surrounding digital wealth.

Concealed wealth in cryptocurrency

Digital assets, which exist only on blockchain technology, are inherently difficult to trace, identify and value, adding an additional layer of complexity for family lawyers dealing with them in financial remedy proceedings. For some, decentralised currency has become a convenient means of concealing wealth, rousing suspicions among an increasing number of clients that their former spouse could be moving funds into cryptocurrency or digital tokens without traceability.

Indeed, Form E (financial statement for a financial order) currently has no dedicated section for digital assets, opening a door for people to deliberately omit any mention of their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll