header-logo header-logo

Dividing digital assets

28 November 2025 / Robert Webster
Issue: 8141 / Categories: Opinion , Crypto , Family , Divorce , Technology , Disclosure
printer mail-detail
237027
Cryptocurrency is changing the face of divorce finances, says Robert Webster

For decades, family lawyers have dealt with a vast range of assets, from property and pensions to jewellery and pets, but now there’s something new to consider—cryptocurrency. Once a rare occurrence, digital assets are becoming increasingly prevalent in high-net-worth financial remedy cases, raising the question of whether practitioners and the law are prepared for disputes surrounding digital wealth.

Concealed wealth in cryptocurrency

Digital assets, which exist only on blockchain technology, are inherently difficult to trace, identify and value, adding an additional layer of complexity for family lawyers dealing with them in financial remedy proceedings. For some, decentralised currency has become a convenient means of concealing wealth, rousing suspicions among an increasing number of clients that their former spouse could be moving funds into cryptocurrency or digital tokens without traceability.

Indeed, Form E (financial statement for a financial order) currently has no dedicated section for digital assets, opening a door for people to deliberately omit any mention of their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll