header-logo header-logo

28 November 2025 / Robert Webster
Issue: 8141 / Categories: Opinion , Crypto , Family , Divorce , Technology , Disclosure
printer mail-detail

Dividing digital assets

237027
Cryptocurrency is changing the face of divorce finances, says Robert Webster

For decades, family lawyers have dealt with a vast range of assets, from property and pensions to jewellery and pets, but now there’s something new to consider—cryptocurrency. Once a rare occurrence, digital assets are becoming increasingly prevalent in high-net-worth financial remedy cases, raising the question of whether practitioners and the law are prepared for disputes surrounding digital wealth.

Concealed wealth in cryptocurrency

Digital assets, which exist only on blockchain technology, are inherently difficult to trace, identify and value, adding an additional layer of complexity for family lawyers dealing with them in financial remedy proceedings. For some, decentralised currency has become a convenient means of concealing wealth, rousing suspicions among an increasing number of clients that their former spouse could be moving funds into cryptocurrency or digital tokens without traceability.

Indeed, Form E (financial statement for a financial order) currently has no dedicated section for digital assets, opening a door for people to deliberately omit any mention of their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll