header-logo header-logo

28 November 2025
Issue: 8141 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Cyber , Technology , Risk management , Cybercrime
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Cyber drills build real-world resilience

237018
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week

Static compliance documents give the illusion of readiness, but real-world crises demand reflex, not reference.

Morris advocates immersive tabletop simulations—interactive exercises mirroring genuine breaches—to train teams under pressure. Such drills expose procedural gaps, align decision-makers and test legal, technical and communications responses in real time. For lawyers, they reveal how clients truly behave in crisis; for insurers, they sharpen risk pricing and reward preparedness.

These simulations transform organisations from passive planners to active defenders, making legal departments proactive partners in governance. The message: cyber resilience isn’t written—it’s rehearsed.

RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll