header-logo header-logo

28 November 2025
Issue: 8141 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Disciplinary&grievance procedures
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Fairness from day one

237021
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims

Every employee will enjoy protection from their first day. The reform keeps the ‘range of reasonable responses’ test but vastly expands who can bring claims, moving litigation focus from eligibility to fairness.

Probationary dismissals and short-term contracts must now meet full procedural standards under Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd. Employers must document reviews, feedback and reasons; tribunals will scrutinise even early exits. Large HR teams may adapt easily, but SMEs face steep learning curves.

Hargreaves and Johnston predict rising claims, tighter documentation culture and a decisive shift toward evidence-based management—making fairness not a privilege of tenure, but a universal obligation.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll