header-logo header-logo

28 November 2025
Issue: 8141 / Categories: Legal News , Civil way , Procedure & practice , Landlord&tenant , CPR
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Pets, probate & public access—civil law’s busy winter

NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column

The Renters’ Rights Act 2025 abolishes assured shortholds and grants tenants the right to keep pets with landlords’ consent from May 2026—Rufus the labradoodle included.

Meanwhile, a pilot under new CPR PD 51ZH from January 2026 will publish key Commercial Court documents online, a win for transparency but a headache for practitioners.

Court fees rise again, with probate copies soaring from £1.50 to £16, and ACAS conciliation windows double from six to 12 weeks. Even Help with Fees gets a technical fix.

Beneath the wit, Gold’s message is clear: litigation costs are climbing, openness is expanding, and housing lawyers must brace for a post-section 21 world that brings as many barking disputes as legal briefs.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll