header-logo header-logo

Closed material procedure

08 August 2014
Issue: 7618 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Browning v Information Commissioner and another [2014] EWCA Civ 1050, [2014] All ER (D) 04 (Aug)

The claimant submitted that the Tribunal Procedure (First-Tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 (SI 2009/1976) (the Rules) did not and, as a matter of vires, could not permit the exclusion of a legal representative who was willing to give an undertaking as to confidentiality. He alternatively submitted that, even if such an interpretation was a tenable one, it should be resisted because the fundamental principles of open justice and natural justice demanded a more restrictive interpretation. Section 22, and paras 7(g), 11(1) and 16 of Sch 5 to the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 (the 2007 Act), and rr 5(3)(g) and 35 of the Rules were considered.

The court, in dismissing the appeal, held that the Rules, in particular rr 5(3)(g) and 35 of the Rules, fell within the vires conferred by s 22, and paras 7(g), 11(1) and 16 of Sch 5 to the 2007 Act. On the face of it, they permitted the procedure that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll