header-logo header-logo

21 March 2014
Issue: 7599 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Clubs

Speechley and others v Allott and others [2014] EWCA Civ 230, [2014] All ER (D) 89 (Mar)

In the course of a dispute about the management of a working men’s club, the claimant sought orders, including as to the validity of a meeting electing club officers. The judge held the meeting was valid, despite failure to comply with the club rules. The claimant appealed. Allowing the appeal, the Court of Appeal held that an election by acclaim or a show of hands, when the rules required a ballot, was not a failure of form rather than substance. Adequate notice of the business to be transacted at the meeting had not been given and the irregularities had not been mere matters of form. Accordingly, the president and the treasurer had not been validly elected. With respect to the committee members, the absence of nomination sheets for the three weeks preceding the meeting meant that the names of the candidates had not been publicised in advance of the meeting and there had been no opportunity to propose alternative candidates. That

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law expands workplace law offering with specialist healthcare regulatory appointment

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC strengthens Dispute Resolution team with partner hire

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose announces partner promotions

NEWS
Group claims, disputed costs and judicial recruitment dominate the latest courtroom round-up
Landlords face fresh registration duties as procedural reforms reshape the civil courts
Sanctions can derail commercial disputes long before judgment, making early planning essential
Pressure is mounting for a dedicated UK AI law, but deciding what it should achieve remains the central challenge
Legal professional privilege has checked the SRA’s investigative powers, exposing difficult questions about tackling suspected abusive litigation
back-to-top-scroll