header-logo header-logo

Clydesdale hit by largest fine

16 April 2015
Issue: 7648 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has handed its largest ever fine for payment protection insurance (PPI) failings to Clydesdale Bank Plc.

The bank was fined £20,678,300 for serious failings in its PPI complaint handling processes between May 2011 and July 2013. The FCA found that up to 42,200 out of 126,600 PPI complaints decided between those dates may have been unfairly rejected, and up to 50,900 upheld complaints may have resulted in inadequate redress for customers.

Clydesdale’s PPI complaint handlers did not take into account all relevant documents when handling complaints. The bank provided false information to the Financial Ombudsman Service in response to requests for evidence of the records it held on PPI policies sold to individual customers.

Georgina Philippou, the FCA’s acting director of enforcement and market oversight, says: “The fact that Clydesdale misled the Financial Ombudsman by providing false information about the information it held is particularly serious and this is reflected in the size of the fine.”

Issue: 7648 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll