header-logo header-logo

Co-op steals a march

09 June 2011
Issue: 7469 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Launch marks pre-emptive move in “Tesco law” strategy

The Co-operative is trialling a scheme to offer legal services through its high street banks.

It launched a pilot scheme this week at three Britannia branches in Bristol, ahead of the liberalisation of the legal services marketplace in October. It intends to use the results to help it formulate its future “Tesco law” strategy.  It will be offering free legal advice to customers who drop in or request an appointment for the next two weeks.

The Co-operative Legal Services (CLS) has teamed up with its sister organisation, the Co-operative Financial Services (CFS) to run the pilot.
Rod Bulmer, managing director of retail, at CFS says: “There are nearly 350 branches of Britannia and The Co-operative Bank across the UK, so this pilot scheme will enable us to assess how legal services can be delivered on the high street.

“If successful, there is clearly great potential to bring these services under one roof.”

Eddie Ryan, managing director of CLS, adds: “The Legal Services Act will radically change the way in which solicitor services are delivered in England and Wales.

“The shake-up that the new Act offers is absolutely necessary if legal services are to become more accessible to customers. Many people feel that solicitors communicate with them poorly, use jargon that is confusing and don’t understand how services are priced.”

CLS launched in 2006 with a target of employing 150 people within a five-year period but has grown faster than expected and currently employs more than 380 staff, who offer legal help and advice on personal injury claims, will writing, probate and estate administration, conveyancing and employment law.

Branding expert, Pearse McCabe, strategy and planning director at Rufus Leonard, says the Co-op is in an “enviable position” and has “proven that its brand can stretch into retail, financial services, funeral care and pharmacy to name just a few.

“Much like QualitySolicitors did with its TV advertising, The Co-op has made a pre-emptive move enabling it to ‘steal a march’ on its competitors and heighten awareness around the new service line. This face-to-face contact with the local community has the potential to supplement its existing telephone-based advice service with invaluable knowledge about the people it’s selling to.”

Issue: 7469 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll