header-logo header-logo

Cohabitation in 2017–18 (Pt 3)

18 May 2018 / David Burrows
Issue: 7793 / Categories: Features , Family , Property
printer mail-detail
nlj_7793_burrows_0

In part three of this special series, David Burrows considers the property rights of unmarried parents

  • What rights to property does an unmarried parent and that parent’s child have in their family home?
  • What happens to the home when that parent’s relationship breaks down?
  • What law and court procedure dictates how the family home is dealt with?

This cohabitation law series started in NLJ last year: Part 1 dealt with an introduction to the law to which unmarried couples are subject, and Part 2 to specific areas of property and trust law (implied trusts) as it applies outside marriage (Pt 1, 167 NLJ 7736 & Pt 2, 167 NLJ 7770). This third part looks at the law and procedural cross-over between property proceedings where a partner wants to claim a differential share in jointly owned property or a share in property owned solely by one partner (the law explained in Pt 2); and where the couple have one or more dependent child(ren).

In the meantime, Graeme Fraser recently

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll