header-logo header-logo

18 May 2018 / David Burrows
Issue: 7793 / Categories: Features , Family , Property
printer mail-detail

Cohabitation in 2017–18 (Pt 3)

nlj_7793_burrows_0

In part three of this special series, David Burrows considers the property rights of unmarried parents

  • What rights to property does an unmarried parent and that parent’s child have in their family home?
  • What happens to the home when that parent’s relationship breaks down?
  • What law and court procedure dictates how the family home is dealt with?

This cohabitation law series started in NLJ last year: Part 1 dealt with an introduction to the law to which unmarried couples are subject, and Part 2 to specific areas of property and trust law (implied trusts) as it applies outside marriage (Pt 1, 167 NLJ 7736 & Pt 2, 167 NLJ 7770). This third part looks at the law and procedural cross-over between property proceedings where a partner wants to claim a differential share in jointly owned property or a share in property owned solely by one partner (the law explained in Pt 2); and where the couple have one or more dependent child(ren).

In the meantime, Graeme Fraser recently

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll