header-logo header-logo

18 May 2018 / David Burrows
Issue: 7793 / Categories: Features , Family , Property
printer mail-detail

Cohabitation in 2017–18 (Pt 3)

nlj_7793_burrows_0

In part three of this special series, David Burrows considers the property rights of unmarried parents

  • What rights to property does an unmarried parent and that parent’s child have in their family home?
  • What happens to the home when that parent’s relationship breaks down?
  • What law and court procedure dictates how the family home is dealt with?

This cohabitation law series started in NLJ last year: Part 1 dealt with an introduction to the law to which unmarried couples are subject, and Part 2 to specific areas of property and trust law (implied trusts) as it applies outside marriage (Pt 1, 167 NLJ 7736 & Pt 2, 167 NLJ 7770). This third part looks at the law and procedural cross-over between property proceedings where a partner wants to claim a differential share in jointly owned property or a share in property owned solely by one partner (the law explained in Pt 2); and where the couple have one or more dependent child(ren).

In the meantime, Graeme Fraser recently

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll