header-logo header-logo

Cohabitation in 2017–18 (Pt 3)

18 May 2018 / David Burrows
Issue: 7793 / Categories: Features , Family , Property
printer mail-detail
nlj_7793_burrows_0

In part three of this special series, David Burrows considers the property rights of unmarried parents

  • What rights to property does an unmarried parent and that parent’s child have in their family home?
  • What happens to the home when that parent’s relationship breaks down?
  • What law and court procedure dictates how the family home is dealt with?

This cohabitation law series started in NLJ last year: Part 1 dealt with an introduction to the law to which unmarried couples are subject, and Part 2 to specific areas of property and trust law (implied trusts) as it applies outside marriage (Pt 1, 167 NLJ 7736 & Pt 2, 167 NLJ 7770). This third part looks at the law and procedural cross-over between property proceedings where a partner wants to claim a differential share in jointly owned property or a share in property owned solely by one partner (the law explained in Pt 2); and where the couple have one or more dependent child(ren).

In the meantime, Graeme Fraser recently

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll