header-logo header-logo

03 March 2017 / David Burrows
Issue: 7736 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Cohabitation in 2017 (Pt 1)

nlj_7736_burrows

In the first of a series of articles David Burrows explores the complex law which confronts cohabiting couples who separate

  • Family breakdown law discriminates as between married and unmarried couples (especially in relation to distribution of property)
  • Mostly the law in relation to children and their maintenance treats parents the same, whether they are married to one another or not

In November 2016 the Office of National Statistics published its statistical bulletin Families and households in the UK: 2016 which included the information that there are now 3.3 million cohabiting couple families in the UK, and that this number has doubled in the past 20 years. Resolution (a group of specialist family lawyers) commented: “Under current cohabitation law it’s possible to live with someone for decades and even to have children together and then simply walk away without taking any responsibility for a former partner…This can have a huge impact on women and children.”

This statement provides an initial, and partial, view of the complex law which confronts cohabiting couples

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll