header-logo header-logo

Cohabitation in 2017 (Pt 1)

03 March 2017 / David Burrows
Issue: 7736 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
nlj_7736_burrows

In the first of a series of articles David Burrows explores the complex law which confronts cohabiting couples who separate

  • Family breakdown law discriminates as between married and unmarried couples (especially in relation to distribution of property)
  • Mostly the law in relation to children and their maintenance treats parents the same, whether they are married to one another or not

In November 2016 the Office of National Statistics published its statistical bulletin Families and households in the UK: 2016 which included the information that there are now 3.3 million cohabiting couple families in the UK, and that this number has doubled in the past 20 years. Resolution (a group of specialist family lawyers) commented: “Under current cohabitation law it’s possible to live with someone for decades and even to have children together and then simply walk away without taking any responsibility for a former partner…This can have a huge impact on women and children.”

This statement provides an initial, and partial, view of the complex law which confronts cohabiting couples

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll