header-logo header-logo

15 May 2026
Issue: 8161 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Regulatory , Profession , Diversity
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform

249526
© The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ

She says the case exposed ‘significant flaws in the regulatory framework’ and revealed how fragile progress on diversity remains. Coupland warns that local authorities paused legal processes, law centres struggled to service vulnerable clients, and firms questioned operating models after the original ruling.

While many lawyers supported CILEX’s challenge, she says ‘old, elitist attitudes’ also resurfaced against CILEX practitioners.

Calling the judgment ‘a wake-up call’, Coupland argues regulators must modernise for ‘the reality of how legal services are delivered today’, embracing alternative routes into law and resisting vested interests that threaten a ‘thriving, diverse and competitive legal sector’.

RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law expands workplace law offering with specialist healthcare regulatory appointment

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC strengthens Dispute Resolution team with partner hire

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose announces partner promotions

NEWS
Group claims, disputed costs and judicial recruitment dominate the latest courtroom round-up
Landlords face fresh registration duties as procedural reforms reshape the civil courts
Sanctions can derail commercial disputes long before judgment, making early planning essential
Pressure is mounting for a dedicated UK AI law, but deciding what it should achieve remains the central challenge
Legal professional privilege has checked the SRA’s investigative powers, exposing difficult questions about tackling suspected abusive litigation
back-to-top-scroll