header-logo header-logo

15 May 2026
Issue: 8161 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Regulatory , Profession , Diversity
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform

249526
© The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ

She says the case exposed ‘significant flaws in the regulatory framework’ and revealed how fragile progress on diversity remains. Coupland warns that local authorities paused legal processes, law centres struggled to service vulnerable clients, and firms questioned operating models after the original ruling.

While many lawyers supported CILEX’s challenge, she says ‘old, elitist attitudes’ also resurfaced against CILEX practitioners.

Calling the judgment ‘a wake-up call’, Coupland argues regulators must modernise for ‘the reality of how legal services are delivered today’, embracing alternative routes into law and resisting vested interests that threaten a ‘thriving, diverse and competitive legal sector’.

RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll