header-logo header-logo

15 May 2026 / Jennifer Coupland
Issue: 8161 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Mazur: A wake-up call?

© The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives
The profession has been presented with a rare opportunity to reflect on the delivery of legal services in the modern age, writes CILEX CEO Jennifer Coupland

With confirmation that there will be no appeal following the Court of Appeal’s March judgment in Mazur and another v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP and another (CILEX and others, intervening) [2026] EWCA Civ 369, the decision stands. Firms can now move forward with renewed clarity and certainty around supervision and the conduct of litigation.

Many in the legal sector will be breathing a sigh of relief, but it would be a mistake to move on without acknowledging the significant flaws in the regulatory framework the case brought to light. Mazur is a wake-up call and an opportunity to look at how we can reshape legal services for the better.

Industry-wide impact

In the lead-up to CILEX’s decision to appeal Mr Justice Sheldon’s 2025 judgment, many counselled us against it. We sought to form a consensus in the profession that, given how detrimental the decision

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll