header-logo header-logo

15 May 2026 / Jennifer Coupland
Issue: 8161 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Mazur: A wake-up call?

© The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives
The profession has been presented with a rare opportunity to reflect on the delivery of legal services in the modern age, writes CILEX CEO Jennifer Coupland

With confirmation that there will be no appeal following the Court of Appeal’s March judgment in Mazur and another v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP and another (CILEX and others, intervening) [2026] EWCA Civ 369, the decision stands. Firms can now move forward with renewed clarity and certainty around supervision and the conduct of litigation.

Many in the legal sector will be breathing a sigh of relief, but it would be a mistake to move on without acknowledging the significant flaws in the regulatory framework the case brought to light. Mazur is a wake-up call and an opportunity to look at how we can reshape legal services for the better.

Industry-wide impact

In the lead-up to CILEX’s decision to appeal Mr Justice Sheldon’s 2025 judgment, many counselled us against it. We sought to form a consensus in the profession that, given how detrimental the decision

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll