© Shutterstck/MyBears
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
Examining Re N (Paternity: Unregulated Sperm Donor), Hurren explains how Sir Andrew McFarlane concluded that granting the declaration would be ‘manifestly contrary to public policy’. The donor, alleged to have fathered around 180 children, was found to be operating outside the tightly regulated Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act framework.
Hurren says the judgment reinforces why Parliament strictly controls gamete donation, citing concerns over welfare, record-keeping and exploitation.
While the president stressed the decision was confined to ‘extreme facts’, Hurren describes the case as ‘a cautionary tale’ for prospective parents considering private donor arrangements without legal advice or clinic safeguards.
RELATED ARTICLES
