header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
15 May 2026 / Liam Hurren
Issue: 8161 / Categories: Features , Family , Public , Health , Child law
printer mail-detail

Unregulated sperm donation, best interests & public policy

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
249523
© Shutterstck/MyBears
Liam Hurren reports on the legal & ethical risks highlighted by the recent Joe Donor case
  • Sir Andrew McFarlane refused the sperm donor’s application to be recorded as the child’s legal parent on the basis that to do so would be manifestly contrary to public policy.
  • The case acts as a warning of the inherent risks for all prospective parents who are considering having children without the support of a UK licensed fertility clinic.

Beginning with the factual background, the recent case Re N (paternity: unregulated sperm donor) [2026] EWHC 878 (Fam) (referred to in the media as the ‘Joe Donor’ case) concerned a child (‘N’) who was born in autumn 2021 having been conceived using sperm provided by the applicant, Mr Robert Albon—a prolific unregulated sperm donor, said to have fathered some 180 children.

Mr Albon attended the home of JE (the mother) and EF (her partner) on two occasions, and N was conceived after the second donation. There was no discussion

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Zylpha LogoClick to know more
Browne Jacobson—Simone Ketchell

Browne Jacobson—Simone Ketchell

Browne Jacobson adds top property litigation Partner in record real estate expansion

Fieldfisher—Megan Goodyer

Fieldfisher—Megan Goodyer

Fieldfisher expands Personal Injury team with impressive partner from Stewarts

Clyde & Co—Jack Holling

Clyde & Co—Jack Holling

Global firm strengthens insurance practice with appointment of partner

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Fairness or formula? Rethinking discipline for dishonest lawyers
Should every solicitor found to have acted dishonestly face automatic striking off? The answer, argues John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke LLP in NLJ this week, is no 
NLJ this week: Sovereign immunity still blocks award enforcement
Winning an arbitral award against a state is one thing; enforcing it is another
NLJ this week: What court losses reveal about government power
Can government success in court tell us whether the rule of law is healthy? 
NLJ this week: Courts favour common sense over clumsy clauses
Poorly drafted dispute resolution clauses can trigger litigation before the real dispute is even addressed
NLJ this week: Crypto assets under the divorce spotlight
As cryptocurrency becomes mainstream, family lawyers are increasingly confronting the challenges it creates on divorce
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll