header-logo header-logo

15 May 2026 / Liam Hurren
Issue: 8161 / Categories: Features , Family , Public , Health , Child law
printer mail-detail

Unregulated sperm donation, best interests & public policy

249523
© Shutterstck/MyBears
Liam Hurren reports on the legal & ethical risks highlighted by the recent Joe Donor case
  • Sir Andrew McFarlane refused the sperm donor’s application to be recorded as the child’s legal parent on the basis that to do so would be manifestly contrary to public policy.
  • The case acts as a warning of the inherent risks for all prospective parents who are considering having children without the support of a UK licensed fertility clinic.

Beginning with the factual background, the recent case Re N (paternity: unregulated sperm donor) [2026] EWHC 878 (Fam) (referred to in the media as the ‘Joe Donor’ case) concerned a child (‘N’) who was born in autumn 2021 having been conceived using sperm provided by the applicant, Mr Robert Albon—a prolific unregulated sperm donor, said to have fathered some 180 children.

Mr Albon attended the home of JE (the mother) and EF (her partner) on two occasions, and N was conceived after the second donation. There was no discussion

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll