header-logo header-logo

16 May 2025 / Caroline Bowden
Issue: 8116 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Cohabitees: crafted or shafted?

218612
Caroline Bowden sets out the need for cohabitation reform—for some couples but not others
  • This article discusses the need for law reform to protect vulnerable cohabitees, particularly women, who are economically disadvantaged in cohabiting relationships.
  • It differentiates between crafted couples, who choose not to legally regulate their relationship, and shafted couples, in which one partner is economically dominant.
  • It suggests new legal provisions to better protect vulnerable cohabitees.

Why cohabit? All couples are now free to marry and all couples are now free to enter a civil partnership. Should there be law reform for couples who choose not to commit to either?

That question has already been answered. The government’s pre-election manifesto pledged to ‘strengthen the rights and protections available to women in cohabiting couples’.

Why just women? What about same-sex couples, or when the male cohabitee takes on the main parenting role? While the law is sure to cover these situations, the government has framed the problem around the most common stereotype: a more financially powerful man/father and his more economically

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll