header-logo header-logo

Cohabitees: crafted or shafted?

16 May 2025 / Caroline Bowden
Issue: 8116 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
218612
Caroline Bowden sets out the need for cohabitation reform—for some couples but not others
  • This article discusses the need for law reform to protect vulnerable cohabitees, particularly women, who are economically disadvantaged in cohabiting relationships.
  • It differentiates between crafted couples, who choose not to legally regulate their relationship, and shafted couples, in which one partner is economically dominant.
  • It suggests new legal provisions to better protect vulnerable cohabitees.

Why cohabit? All couples are now free to marry and all couples are now free to enter a civil partnership. Should there be law reform for couples who choose not to commit to either?

That question has already been answered. The government’s pre-election manifesto pledged to ‘strengthen the rights and protections available to women in cohabiting couples’.

Why just women? What about same-sex couples, or when the male cohabitee takes on the main parenting role? While the law is sure to cover these situations, the government has framed the problem around the most common stereotype: a more financially powerful man/father and his more economically

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll