header-logo header-logo

16 May 2025 / Caroline Bowden
Issue: 8116 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Cohabitees: crafted or shafted?

218612
Caroline Bowden sets out the need for cohabitation reform—for some couples but not others
  • This article discusses the need for law reform to protect vulnerable cohabitees, particularly women, who are economically disadvantaged in cohabiting relationships.
  • It differentiates between crafted couples, who choose not to legally regulate their relationship, and shafted couples, in which one partner is economically dominant.
  • It suggests new legal provisions to better protect vulnerable cohabitees.

Why cohabit? All couples are now free to marry and all couples are now free to enter a civil partnership. Should there be law reform for couples who choose not to commit to either?

That question has already been answered. The government’s pre-election manifesto pledged to ‘strengthen the rights and protections available to women in cohabiting couples’.

Why just women? What about same-sex couples, or when the male cohabitee takes on the main parenting role? While the law is sure to cover these situations, the government has framed the problem around the most common stereotype: a more financially powerful man/father and his more economically

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll