header-logo header-logo

26 March 2019 / Sophia Purkis , Victoria Prince
Issue: 7835 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Collateral use: compulsion is not enough

The courts can & will exercise their discretion in determining if collateral use is permissible, say Sophia Purkis & Victoria Prince

Disclosure, the use of documents and the interrelationship between proceedings—be they criminal and/or civil, and brought in different or the same jurisdictions—are all topics which are increasingly exercising the courts.

Mr Justice Hildyard’s recent judgment in ACL Netherlands BV (as successor to Autonomy Corporation Ltd) and other companies v Lynch and another [2019] EWHC 249 (Ch) provides an insightful illustration of the principles governing the collateral use of documents and witness statements required to comply with foreign legal obligations.

The claim

Subsidiaries of a US company, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), brought a US$ multi-billion claim in England against two defendants alleged to have fraudulently manipulated the accounting system of a company acquired by the Hewlett-Packard group. The trial of that claim was listed to start in March 2019.

US criminal proceedings arising out of the same circumstances had resulted in a conviction against the second defendant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll