header-logo header-logo

26 March 2019 / Sophia Purkis , Victoria Prince
Issue: 7835 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Collateral use: compulsion is not enough

The courts can & will exercise their discretion in determining if collateral use is permissible, say Sophia Purkis & Victoria Prince

Disclosure, the use of documents and the interrelationship between proceedings—be they criminal and/or civil, and brought in different or the same jurisdictions—are all topics which are increasingly exercising the courts.

Mr Justice Hildyard’s recent judgment in ACL Netherlands BV (as successor to Autonomy Corporation Ltd) and other companies v Lynch and another [2019] EWHC 249 (Ch) provides an insightful illustration of the principles governing the collateral use of documents and witness statements required to comply with foreign legal obligations.

The claim

Subsidiaries of a US company, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), brought a US$ multi-billion claim in England against two defendants alleged to have fraudulently manipulated the accounting system of a company acquired by the Hewlett-Packard group. The trial of that claim was listed to start in March 2019.

US criminal proceedings arising out of the same circumstances had resulted in a conviction against the second defendant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll