header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
13 December 2013 / Jessica Stretch
Issue: 7588 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

The colour purple

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
web_stretch

Jessica Stretch provides guidance on protecting colour & shape trade marks
When asked to think of a famous trade mark, most people will cite a brand name or logo. In fact, trade marks can be registered for many aspects of a brand such as colour, shape, sound and smell. Legislation defines a trade mark as (i) a sign (ii) capable of being represented graphically and (iii) capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings (the Trade Marks Act 1994, s 1(1) and Directive (EC) 2008/95, Art 2).

 

The Court of Appeal has recently explored the meaning of “graphic representation” in the context of Cadbury’s application for the colour purple and JW Spear’s registration for the shape and colour of a Scrabble tile (Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Cadbury UK Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1174, [2013] All ER (D) 35 (Oct) and JW Spear & Son Ltd v Zynga Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 1175, [2013] All ER (D) 39 (Oct)). These cases highlight some common

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll