header-logo header-logo

Come in number 43

04 March 2011 / Louise Smail , Gerard Forlin KC
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Since 1194 when the office of coroner was established, the role and significance of coroners has increased.

Gerard Forlin QC & Louise Smail assess the impact of Rule 43

Since 1194 when the office of coroner was established, the role and significance of coroners has increased. The coroner’s role is an independent judicial officer who investigates sudden, violent, or unnatural death. The verdict must be given in such a way that it doesn’t appear to determine any question of criminal or civil liability. An inquest should not take place until the police have confirmed that there are to be no prosecutions.

However, if in the course of the inquest evidence arises which suggests there ought to be a prosecution, then the coroner is able to refer the matter back to the police and/or director of public prosecutions to reconsider the matter. If there is an unlawful killing verdict, the matter is automatically referred back to the police. In relation to health and safety prosecutions these normally, but not always, are brought

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll