header-logo header-logo

04 March 2011 / Louise Smail , Gerard Forlin KC
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Come in number 43

Since 1194 when the office of coroner was established, the role and significance of coroners has increased.

Gerard Forlin QC & Louise Smail assess the impact of Rule 43

Since 1194 when the office of coroner was established, the role and significance of coroners has increased. The coroner’s role is an independent judicial officer who investigates sudden, violent, or unnatural death. The verdict must be given in such a way that it doesn’t appear to determine any question of criminal or civil liability. An inquest should not take place until the police have confirmed that there are to be no prosecutions.

However, if in the course of the inquest evidence arises which suggests there ought to be a prosecution, then the coroner is able to refer the matter back to the police and/or director of public prosecutions to reconsider the matter. If there is an unlawful killing verdict, the matter is automatically referred back to the police. In relation to health and safety prosecutions these normally, but not always, are brought

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll