header-logo header-logo

Coming to terms

13 October 2011 / Caroline Kehoe
Issue: 7485 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Caroline Kehoe deciphers the meaning of “reasonable endeavours” & “good faith”

Where it is not appropriate to impose an absolute contractual obligation two terms frequently bandied about during negotiations are “reasonable endeavours” and “good faith” but a good deal of uncertainty remains as to what each means in practice.

Endeavours clauses

Before agreeing to any particular terminology it is important to know what the obligation you are committing to really means—what would amount to a breach? The wealth of case law gives some insight but ultimately each case depends on its own facts. In the most recent case, Jet2.Com Limited v Blackpool Airport Limited [2011] EWHC 1529, [2011] All ER (D) 06 (Jul), Mackie J said: “The meaning of the expression remains a question of construction not of extrapolation from other cases…the expression will not always mean the same thing.”

The lowest hurdle

A “reasonable endeavours” clause is defined by reference to an objective standard of what an ordinary competent person might do in the same circumstances (The Talisman [1989] 1 Lloyd’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll