header-logo header-logo

13 October 2011 / Caroline Kehoe
Issue: 7485 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Coming to terms

Caroline Kehoe deciphers the meaning of “reasonable endeavours” & “good faith”

Where it is not appropriate to impose an absolute contractual obligation two terms frequently bandied about during negotiations are “reasonable endeavours” and “good faith” but a good deal of uncertainty remains as to what each means in practice.

Endeavours clauses

Before agreeing to any particular terminology it is important to know what the obligation you are committing to really means—what would amount to a breach? The wealth of case law gives some insight but ultimately each case depends on its own facts. In the most recent case, Jet2.Com Limited v Blackpool Airport Limited [2011] EWHC 1529, [2011] All ER (D) 06 (Jul), Mackie J said: “The meaning of the expression remains a question of construction not of extrapolation from other cases…the expression will not always mean the same thing.”

The lowest hurdle

A “reasonable endeavours” clause is defined by reference to an objective standard of what an ordinary competent person might do in the same circumstances (The Talisman [1989] 1 Lloyd’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll