header-logo header-logo

13 October 2011 / Caroline Kehoe
Issue: 7485 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Coming to terms

Caroline Kehoe deciphers the meaning of “reasonable endeavours” & “good faith”

Where it is not appropriate to impose an absolute contractual obligation two terms frequently bandied about during negotiations are “reasonable endeavours” and “good faith” but a good deal of uncertainty remains as to what each means in practice.

Endeavours clauses

Before agreeing to any particular terminology it is important to know what the obligation you are committing to really means—what would amount to a breach? The wealth of case law gives some insight but ultimately each case depends on its own facts. In the most recent case, Jet2.Com Limited v Blackpool Airport Limited [2011] EWHC 1529, [2011] All ER (D) 06 (Jul), Mackie J said: “The meaning of the expression remains a question of construction not of extrapolation from other cases…the expression will not always mean the same thing.”

The lowest hurdle

A “reasonable endeavours” clause is defined by reference to an objective standard of what an ordinary competent person might do in the same circumstances (The Talisman [1989] 1 Lloyd’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll