header-logo header-logo

08 December 2021
Issue: 7960 / Categories: Legal News , Equality , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Commission recommends hate crime reforms

LGBT+ and disabled victims would be given the same protection as those targeted because of their race and religion, under a shake-up of hate crime legislation recommended by the Law Commission

In 2020/21, there were 10,679 prosecutions and 9,263 convictions for hate crimes in England and Wales. However, crimes involving racial or religious hostility can be treated as ‘aggravated offences’ and receive higher maximum sentences than the base offence, whereas crimes involving hostility on the basis of the victim’s sexual orientation, trans identity or disability qualify for ‘enhanced sentencing’ which increases the sentence, but only within the existing maximum. The commission proposes that the five characteristics be protected equally.

The proposals, announced this week, would also increase protection for women and girls by extending the offence of stirring up hatred (behaviour that incites others to hate entire groups) to cover sex or gender. This is aimed at tackling ‘incel’ (involuntarily celibate) ideology, following an increase in rape and murder threats against women from incels.

The commission recommends the government consider a new offence of public sexual harassment, which it believes would provide more effective protection than adding sex or gender to hate crime laws.

It also proposes tightening up freedom of expression laws, and would safeguard private conversations regardless of where they take place and ‘neutral reporting’ by

journalists of inflammatory hate speech. It proposes providing explicit protection for certain controversial topics―‘gender critical’ views, criticism of foreign governments and discussion of cultural practices and immigration, asylum and citizenship policy.

While hate speech and ‘stirring up’ offences (for example, racist chanting at football matches) receive a lot of public attention, the Commission highlights that the threshold for prosecution is high, and there are fewer than ten prosecutions in a typical year. There is currently no ‘stirring up’ offence for hate speech on the basis of disability or trans identity.

Law Commissioner, Prof Penney Lewis said: ‘Hate crime has a terrible impact on victims and it’s unacceptable that the current levels of protection are so inconsistent.

‘Our recommendations would improve protections for victims while also ensuring that the right of freedom of expression is safeguarded.’

Issue: 7960 / Categories: Legal News , Equality , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll