header-logo header-logo

28 May 2025
Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Contempt , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Committee to investigate sub judice debate

A parliamentary committee is investigating the sub judice resolution, which prevents MPs from referring to a current or impending court case

The House of Commons Procedure Committee will investigate, among other things, whether the current rule strikes the right balance, whether it should more closely align with the Contempt of Court Act 1981 (or vice versa), and whether current sanctions are sufficient.

It will also address the implications of social media on the resolution.

Cat Smith MP, chair of the Procedure Committee, said: ‘The time is right for an in-depth review.’

Submit evidence by 31 July 2025.

Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Contempt , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll