header-logo header-logo

28 May 2025
Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Contempt , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Committee to investigate sub judice debate

A parliamentary committee is investigating the sub judice resolution, which prevents MPs from referring to a current or impending court case

The House of Commons Procedure Committee will investigate, among other things, whether the current rule strikes the right balance, whether it should more closely align with the Contempt of Court Act 1981 (or vice versa), and whether current sanctions are sufficient.

It will also address the implications of social media on the resolution.

Cat Smith MP, chair of the Procedure Committee, said: ‘The time is right for an in-depth review.’

Submit evidence by 31 July 2025.

Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Contempt , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The government has pledged to ‘move fast’ to protect children from harm caused by artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, and could impose limits on social media as early as the summer
All eyes will be on the Court of Appeal (or its YouTube livestream) next week as it sits to consider the controversial Mazur judgment
An NHS Foundation Trust breached a consultant’s contract by delegating an investigation into his knowledge of nurse Lucy Letby’s case
Draft guidance for schools on how to support gender-questioning pupils provides ‘more clarity’, but headteachers may still need legal advice, an education lawyer has said
Litigation funder Innsworth Capital, which funded behemoth opt-out action Merricks v Mastercard, can bring a judicial review, the High Court ruled last week
back-to-top-scroll