header-logo header-logo

30 March 2007 / Laurie Toczek
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

A common problem

Should old cases be judged on new common law? Laurie Toczek reports

On 13 February 2007, an interview with Professor Graham Zellick, the Chairman of the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), app­eared in the Times. Professor Zellick referred to the recent case of R (Director of Revenue and Customs Prosecutions) v Criminal Cases Review Commission [2006] EWCA 3064 (Admin), [2006] All ER (D) 48 (Dec). One of the questions raised by this case is whether old cases should be judged on ‘new’ common law, as it now is, or as it was when the conviction occurred.

The most famous case in which this issue arose is R v Bentley [1998] EWCA Crim 2516, [1999] Crim LR 330. On the evening of 2 November 1952, Derek Bentley and Christopher Craig climbed onto the roof of a warehouse in Croydon intending to commit a burglary. They were seen and the police were called. One of the officers who attended the scene, PC Sidney Miles, was shot and killed by Craig. Craig was charged with murder. Bentley

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll