header-logo header-logo

Community legal service funding

14 April 2011
Issue: 7461 + 7462 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

F and others v Legal Services Commission [2011] EWHC 899 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 95 (Apr)

Whether someone would suffer financial hardship if their costs were not reimbursed by the losing party was a question of fact and degree. There was no absolute standard by which that could be judged, nor that whether someone had suffered or would suffer financial hardship should be gauged against the criteria laid down for determining whether a person was eligible for public funding in order to bring a claim. If there was to be an absolute standard, it was reasonable to ask what it was.

If Parliament had intended there to be one, or had wished to provide specific criteria against which financial hardship should be judged (whether absolute or otherwise) then it would and could have so provided in the Community Legal Service (Cost Protection) Regulations 2000, SI 2000/824. There had been a deliberate and significant relaxation of the formerly stringent test by the removal of the word “severe”.

There was an obvious difficulty in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll