header-logo header-logo

Companies want stronger action against bribery

08 May 2008
Issue: 7320 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

News

Authorities are too reluctant to prosecute bribery cases, according to the heads of legal and chief compliance officers of ’s largest publicly listed companies. UK-based firms are the most critical, with half of all respondents thinking the authorities are not willing enough to take legal action against suspected bribery. The findings of the 2008 European Corporate Integrity Survey, published by Integrity Interactive, reveal that bribery (48%) is now the issue of most concern to those responsible for preventing corporate malpractice. This is an increase of 14% over the past year.

The research also shows that even when the authorities successfully prosecute, the sentences handed down are considered to be too lenient.

Mark Pieth, chairman of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s working group on bribery, says: “Those surveyed are employed to protect their companies from prosecution; calling for more prosecutions is not in their self-interest. But companies’ integrity has been called into question by the failure of authorities to properly investigate and prosecute instances of bribery.” Nowhere, he says, is this more acute than in the where, despite high profile cases, no prosecution has been brought in the 10 years since the government adopted the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll