header-logo header-logo

08 May 2008
Issue: 7320 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Companies want stronger action against bribery

News

Authorities are too reluctant to prosecute bribery cases, according to the heads of legal and chief compliance officers of Europe’s largest publicly listed companies. UK-based firms are the most critical, with half of all respondents thinking the authorities are not willing enough to take legal action against suspected bribery. The findings of the 2008 European Corporate Integrity Survey, published by Integrity Interactive, reveal that bribery (48%) is now the issue of most concern to those responsible for preventing corporate malpractice. This is an increase of 14% over the past year.

The research also shows that even when the authorities successfully prosecute, the sentences handed down are considered to be too lenient.

Mark Pieth, chairman of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s working group on bribery, says: “Those surveyed are employed to protect their companies from prosecution; calling for more prosecutions is not in their self-interest. But companies’ integrity has been called into question by the failure of authorities to properly investigate and prosecute instances of bribery.” Nowhere, he says, is this more acute than in the UK where, despite high profile cases, no prosecution has been brought in the 10 years since the government adopted the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll