header-logo header-logo

Companies want stronger action against bribery

08 May 2008
Issue: 7320 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

News

Authorities are too reluctant to prosecute bribery cases, according to the heads of legal and chief compliance officers of ’s largest publicly listed companies. UK-based firms are the most critical, with half of all respondents thinking the authorities are not willing enough to take legal action against suspected bribery. The findings of the 2008 European Corporate Integrity Survey, published by Integrity Interactive, reveal that bribery (48%) is now the issue of most concern to those responsible for preventing corporate malpractice. This is an increase of 14% over the past year.

The research also shows that even when the authorities successfully prosecute, the sentences handed down are considered to be too lenient.

Mark Pieth, chairman of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s working group on bribery, says: “Those surveyed are employed to protect their companies from prosecution; calling for more prosecutions is not in their self-interest. But companies’ integrity has been called into question by the failure of authorities to properly investigate and prosecute instances of bribery.” Nowhere, he says, is this more acute than in the where, despite high profile cases, no prosecution has been brought in the 10 years since the government adopted the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll