header-logo header-logo

Company—Scheme of arrangement—Jurisdiction

13 December 2013
Issue: 7588 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Re Magyar Telecom B. V.  [2013] EWHC 3800 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 20 (Dec)

Chancery Division. Richards J, 3 Dec 2013

The Chancery Division has given guidance on the sanctioning of schemes of arrangements involving companies with interests in different jurisdictions.

Daniel Bayfield (instructed by White & Case LLP) for the company.

The proceedings concerned a company incorporated and registered in the Netherlands. It was a member of a group whose principal business was the operation of telecommunication services in Hungary. The parent of the group was Hungarian Telecom LP, a private investment firm incorporated in Guernsey and managed primarily by a company (Mid Europa), which had its headquarters in London and was authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. The principal liabilities of the company arose under an issue of €345m 9.5% notes, due 2016 (the notes), governed by the law of the State of New York and subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of that state in favour of noteholders.
 
A scheme of arrangement was proposed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll