header-logo header-logo

28 October 2011
Issue: 7487 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Company—Winding up—Proof & ranking of claims

Re Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander Ltd (in administration) [2011] UKSC 48, [2011] All ER (D) 158 (Oct)

Supreme Court, Lord Hope DP, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Clarke and Lord Collins SCJJ, 19 Oct 2011

The equitable rule in Cherry v Boultbee may fill the gap left by disapplication of set-off, but it does not work in opposition to it. It produced a similar netting-off effect except where some cogent principle of law requires one claim to be given strict priority to another. The rule against double proof is one such principle: it would be wrong to treat the rule against double proof as trumping set-off but not trumping the rule in Cherry.

Gabriel Moss QC and Richard Fisher (instructed by Allen & Overy LLP) for the trustee. Robin Dicker QC and Tom Smith (instructed by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP) for KSF.

The first respondent bank (KSF) went into administration in October 2008. The second respondent company (Funding) was a wholly-owned subsidiary of KSF and went into administration

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll