header-logo header-logo

30 April 2012
Issue: 7516 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Competition—Merger—Jurisdiction

Ryanair Holdings plc v Office of Fair Trading and another [2012] EWCA Civ 643, [2012] All ER (D) 168 (May)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Sir Andrew Morritt, Hughes and McFarlane LJJ, 22 May 2012

The court considered the interaction between the merger jurisdiction exercisable by the European Commission (the Commission) under Council Regulation (EC) 139/2004 (ECMR) and the similar jurisdiction exercisable by the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) and the Competition Commission under the Enterprise Act 2002 (EA 2002).

Lord Pannick QC and Brian Kennelly (instructed by Covington & Burling LLP) for the claimant. Daniel Beard QC and Julian Gregory (instructed by the General Counsel, OFT) for the OFT. James Flynn QC, Kelyn Bacon and Daniel Piccinin (instructed by Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP and Linklaters LLP) for Aer Lingus.

The claimant was an airline operator. It acquired a large amount of the issued share capital of the second respondent (Aer Lingus). In 2006, the claimant had also made a bid to acquire the outstanding share capital of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers welcomes new associate

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Ward Hadaway lawyer joins Birmingham Law Society Council

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons expands Chelmsford commercial litigation team with two appointments

NEWS
Businesses incorporating open-source software into commercial products could face obligations to disclose valuable source code, with AI-assisted development making licensing risks harder to track
Careless client checks do not automatically make a solicitor dishonest, but deliberately avoiding confirmation of suspected wrongdoing can cross the line
Construction workers injured in comparable accidents can face sharply different routes to compensation on opposite sides of the Atlantic
Victims of undue influence may have more options than simply unwinding a tainted transaction, with courts able to order profits accounts, compensation and, exceptionally, severance
Disabled people could lose vital safeguards following the Supreme Court’s reversal of the Cheshire West test for deprivation of liberty, two barristers warn
back-to-top-scroll