header-logo header-logo

16 November 2012 / Andrew Garbutt
Issue: 7538 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

Compliance is key

istock_000001355541medium_4

Engagement with COLPs & COFAs will reap benefits for law firms says Andrew Garbutt

Firms who co-operate and actively engage with their regulator will reap the benefits, says the Solicitor’s Regulation Authority (SRA). A year on from the introduction of outcomes-focused regulation (OFR), the SRA is stressing the importance of firms creating a firm-wide culture of compliance. Key to making the relationship work will be the SRA’s liaison with the nominated compliance officers for legal practice (COLPs) and compliance officers for finance and administration (COFAs).

While the majority of firms met the SRA’s nomination deadline of 31 July and many more responded to chase-up letters and constructive engagement, there still remain a few hundred who have yet to complete the process.

COLPs & COFAs Conference

Speaking at the COLPs and COFAs Conference in Holborn Bars on 18 October, SRA executive director Samantha Barrass reported on the benefits of co-operation and proactive engagement between the SRA and the regulated community. The SRA is on target to approve nominations by the end

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Employment boutique strengthens data protection and privacy offering with senior consultant hire

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll