header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
29 April 2020 / Annabel Kerley , Jonny Frank
Issue: 7884 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Compliance matters: meeting SFO expectations

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
19888
Jonny Frank & Annabel Kerley offer practical guidance for companies under investigation

 

In brief

 

  • Covers the Serious Fraud Office guidance on compliance programmes.
  • Offers practical tips and steps to follow for companies whose compliance programmes are under investigation.

The UK Serious Fraud Office (SFO) published updated guidance within its Operational Handbook on the effectiveness of corporate compliance programmes in January. The guidance, ‘Evaluating a compliance Programme ’, speaks loudly to organisations, both on the importance of effective remediation and being prepared for the SFO to review the compliance programme itself, in addition to a criminal investigation into the underlying facts (see https://bit.ly/2SayBxl).

In these types of enquiries, time is of the essence, so global and UK-based companies must act immediately. To help get started, below are actionable takeaways for remediation tactics that should meet the SFO’s expectations as well as tips to help organisations prepare for an investigation into their compliance programme.

 

Steps for effective remediation

 

In deciding whether to prosecute, the guidance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll