header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
29 April 2020 / Annabel Kerley , Jonny Frank
Issue: 7884 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Compliance matters: meeting SFO expectations

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
19888
Jonny Frank & Annabel Kerley offer practical guidance for companies under investigation

 

In brief

 

  • Covers the Serious Fraud Office guidance on compliance programmes.
  • Offers practical tips and steps to follow for companies whose compliance programmes are under investigation.

The UK Serious Fraud Office (SFO) published updated guidance within its Operational Handbook on the effectiveness of corporate compliance programmes in January. The guidance, ‘Evaluating a compliance Programme ’, speaks loudly to organisations, both on the importance of effective remediation and being prepared for the SFO to review the compliance programme itself, in addition to a criminal investigation into the underlying facts (see https://bit.ly/2SayBxl).

In these types of enquiries, time is of the essence, so global and UK-based companies must act immediately. To help get started, below are actionable takeaways for remediation tactics that should meet the SFO’s expectations as well as tips to help organisations prepare for an investigation into their compliance programme.

 

Steps for effective remediation

 

In deciding whether to prosecute, the guidance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Policing the safeguards when appointing trust corporations
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
NLJ this week: Two’s company, but three’s a crowd in financial provision cases
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ this week: What the court considers when assessing refusal of ADR
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
NLJ this week: Where would we be without limitation?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
NLJ this week: Finding innovative ways to fund the justice gap
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll