header-logo header-logo

Is compliance too complex?

03 December 2015
Issue: 7679 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Professionals claim compliance represents a risk to global business

Compliance has become so complex that compliance professionals fear it is putting global business at risk, a devastating report has revealed.

Compliance has become so elaborate that 78% of compliance professionals say it now represents a risk in itself, according to research among more than 200 compliance professionals by independent global risk consultancy The Risk Advisory Group. They professionals cited increased regulation as their top challenge in the next 12 months, followed by geopolitical events, in particular the EU referendum.

More than 80% felt compliance had become more complex in the past two years, nearly 70% felt more exposed to risk than they did two years ago, and less than one in five feel very confident in their team’s ability to adequately protect the business, according to the report, The Compliance Horizon.

Nearly 60% described their role as safeguarding their company’s reputation, and more than half cited fear of negative exposure as the main driver for compliance in their organisation.

They were also fairly pessimistic about the future. Less than a third of the professionals believe new talent coming into their industry has what it takes to succeed.

Frank Maher, partner at Legal Risk, says: “A decade ago we had not had the Third EU Money Laundering Directive, the Solicitors Regulation Authority had not been created, there were no compliance officers for legal practice (COLPs) nor compliance officers for finance and administration (COFAs), the reforms of the Legal Services Act 2007, including entity regulation, were merely under discussion and, although the data protection legislation has not changed in that time, its impact has been transformed.

“An example of the increased burden in data protection is the deluge of cyber-attacks on law firms which provides a daily test of their compliance in protecting the personal data of clients, their clients’ customers and their staff with potentially severe consequences if they are hacked. We have also seen a massive growth in the use of financial sanctions.

“For an increasing number of firms, matters are becoming more complex as they expand internationally, giving rise to complex issues of cross-border regulation.”

Issue: 7679 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll