header-logo header-logo

Comply or apply

Steven O’Sullivan examines the impact of Jackson & Mitchell on claims against solicitors 

No civil litigator can have failed to hear about Mitchell v News Group Newspapers [2013] EWCA Civ 1537 [2013] All ER (D) 314 (Nov) and its subsequent cases saying, in short, that following the Jackson reforms of April 2013, no mercy will be shown to solicitors acting for litigants who fail to comply with court orders. Part of the Jackson reforms were implemented by CPR 1.1(2)(f) which states that the overriding objective of dealing with cases justly and at proportionate cost includes “enforcing compliance with rules, practice directions and orders”. This means that even where the parties agree otherwise, the court may nevertheless impose sanctions against defaulting parties.

The “good old days”?

For those of us who defend claims against solicitors, it is interesting to contemplate how this will give rise to professional negligence claims, as they increasingly arrive on our desks. The rising potential for claims is obvious.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll