header-logo header-logo

Comply or apply

Steven O’Sullivan examines the impact of Jackson & Mitchell on claims against solicitors 

No civil litigator can have failed to hear about Mitchell v News Group Newspapers [2013] EWCA Civ 1537 [2013] All ER (D) 314 (Nov) and its subsequent cases saying, in short, that following the Jackson reforms of April 2013, no mercy will be shown to solicitors acting for litigants who fail to comply with court orders. Part of the Jackson reforms were implemented by CPR 1.1(2)(f) which states that the overriding objective of dealing with cases justly and at proportionate cost includes “enforcing compliance with rules, practice directions and orders”. This means that even where the parties agree otherwise, the court may nevertheless impose sanctions against defaulting parties.

The “good old days”?

For those of us who defend claims against solicitors, it is interesting to contemplate how this will give rise to professional negligence claims, as they increasingly arrive on our desks. The rising potential for claims is obvious.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll