header-logo header-logo

Concerns as SQE enters final run

13 November 2019
Issue: 7864 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Training & education
printer mail-detail
The Junior Lawyers Division (JLD) has warned that the Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) ‘poses significant risks to the standing and credibility (both domestically and internationally) of the solicitor qualification’.

In a letter to the Legal Services Board last week, outgoing JLD chair Amy Clowrey expressed ‘support, in principle’ of the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s decision to overhaul the current system and ‘develop a consistent centralised standard’. However, the JLD, which has about 70,000 members, has concerns about the structure of the SQE, and wants to see more consultation take place.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has said it will apply in summer 2020 to the Legal Services Board for final approval of the SQE, which would eventually replace the Legal Practice Course.

In a separate letter to the Welsh Language Commissioner, Clowrey offered to work with her to ensure the SQE is offered in Welsh. The Solicitors Regulation Authority had initially said it would offer a Welsh language version provided parity of standard between the two versions could be achieved and the cost was not exorbitant. The regulator said last month that it would be too expensive and disproportionate to offer a Welsh SQE.

Clowrey also wrote to the Justice Select Committee urging further scrutiny of the SQE, which is ‘by no means a foregone conclusion’. She cited concerns that the exam would ‘dilute the standard of the solicitor qualification in England and Wales (thus making it less appealing as the jurisdiction of choice post-Brexit)’, including excepts from the 2016 consultation responses of Clyde & Co, Linklaters and The Association of Law Teachers. She highlighted, in particular, fears that the multiple choice questions element of the SQE was too easy.

Switalskis associate Clowrey, whose practice specialises in abuse claims, stepped down as chair last week. The new chair is Charlotte Parkinson, litigation associate at Addleshaw Goddard.

Issue: 7864 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Training & education
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll