header-logo header-logo

13 November 2019
Issue: 7864 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Training & education
printer mail-detail

Concerns as SQE enters final run

The Junior Lawyers Division (JLD) has warned that the Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) ‘poses significant risks to the standing and credibility (both domestically and internationally) of the solicitor qualification’.

In a letter to the Legal Services Board last week, outgoing JLD chair Amy Clowrey expressed ‘support, in principle’ of the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s decision to overhaul the current system and ‘develop a consistent centralised standard’. However, the JLD, which has about 70,000 members, has concerns about the structure of the SQE, and wants to see more consultation take place.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has said it will apply in summer 2020 to the Legal Services Board for final approval of the SQE, which would eventually replace the Legal Practice Course.

In a separate letter to the Welsh Language Commissioner, Clowrey offered to work with her to ensure the SQE is offered in Welsh. The Solicitors Regulation Authority had initially said it would offer a Welsh language version provided parity of standard between the two versions could be achieved and the cost was not exorbitant. The regulator said last month that it would be too expensive and disproportionate to offer a Welsh SQE.

Clowrey also wrote to the Justice Select Committee urging further scrutiny of the SQE, which is ‘by no means a foregone conclusion’. She cited concerns that the exam would ‘dilute the standard of the solicitor qualification in England and Wales (thus making it less appealing as the jurisdiction of choice post-Brexit)’, including excepts from the 2016 consultation responses of Clyde & Co, Linklaters and The Association of Law Teachers. She highlighted, in particular, fears that the multiple choice questions element of the SQE was too easy.

Switalskis associate Clowrey, whose practice specialises in abuse claims, stepped down as chair last week. The new chair is Charlotte Parkinson, litigation associate at Addleshaw Goddard.

Issue: 7864 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Training & education
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll