header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
25 November 2011 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7491 / Categories: Features , Child law , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

In the confessional

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Richard Scorer examines the legal principles behind the child abuse scandal in the Catholic Church

Child abuse compensation claims have increased in recent years and a significant proportion of these claims have been brought against the Catholic Church. Many paedophile priests have been convicted and sentenced, but many of their victims have also tried to hold the Catholic Church accountable in the civil courts. Some significant awards of damages have been made. In 2005, one victim of abuse by a priest of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Birmingham was awarded £635,000, a record in an abuse compensation claim. In dealing with these cases, the courts have had to grapple with the extent to which the Church should be held institutionally liable for the behaviour of individual priests.

The issue has been considered most recently in JGE v English Province of Our Lady of Charity (1) and the Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2011] EWHC 2871 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 50 (Nov) (judgment handed down 8 November 2011), a case which

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll