header-logo header-logo

09 February 2012
Issue: 7500 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Confidential information

Coogan v News Group Newspapers Ltd and another; Phillips v News Group Newspapers Ltd and another [2012] EWCA Civ 48, [2012] All ER (D) 12 (Feb)

Technical or commercial information meant confidential information which was technical or commercial in character. In order to be protected in law, and to be characterised as intellectual property, information had to be confidential or had to have the necessary quality of confidence about it. As a matter of ordinary language, “commercial information” meant information which was commercial in character, rather than information which, whatever its nature, might have had a value to someone. While the prevailing current view was that confidential information was not strictly property, it was not inappropriate to include it as an aspect of intellectual property.

Accordingly, unless there was binding authority to the contrary, given the normal meaning of “commercial information”, the draftsman of s 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 had intended that confidential information of a commercial nature would be included within the definition of intellectual property. As a matter of both principle and practice,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll