header-logo header-logo

Confidential information

09 February 2012
Issue: 7500 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Coogan v News Group Newspapers Ltd and another; Phillips v News Group Newspapers Ltd and another [2012] EWCA Civ 48, [2012] All ER (D) 12 (Feb)

Technical or commercial information meant confidential information which was technical or commercial in character. In order to be protected in law, and to be characterised as intellectual property, information had to be confidential or had to have the necessary quality of confidence about it. As a matter of ordinary language, “commercial information” meant information which was commercial in character, rather than information which, whatever its nature, might have had a value to someone. While the prevailing current view was that confidential information was not strictly property, it was not inappropriate to include it as an aspect of intellectual property.

Accordingly, unless there was binding authority to the contrary, given the normal meaning of “commercial information”, the draftsman of s 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 had intended that confidential information of a commercial nature would be included within the definition of intellectual property. As a matter of both principle and practice,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll