header-logo header-logo

Confidential information

09 February 2012
Issue: 7500 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Coogan v News Group Newspapers Ltd and another; Phillips v News Group Newspapers Ltd and another [2012] EWCA Civ 48, [2012] All ER (D) 12 (Feb)

Technical or commercial information meant confidential information which was technical or commercial in character. In order to be protected in law, and to be characterised as intellectual property, information had to be confidential or had to have the necessary quality of confidence about it. As a matter of ordinary language, “commercial information” meant information which was commercial in character, rather than information which, whatever its nature, might have had a value to someone. While the prevailing current view was that confidential information was not strictly property, it was not inappropriate to include it as an aspect of intellectual property.

Accordingly, unless there was binding authority to the contrary, given the normal meaning of “commercial information”, the draftsman of s 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 had intended that confidential information of a commercial nature would be included within the definition of intellectual property. As a matter of both principle and practice,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Scott Hilton & Simon Jones

Laytons ETL—Scott Hilton & Simon Jones

City firm launches real estate corporate team to meet growing client demand

Talbots Law—Clare Regan & Lucy George

Talbots Law—Clare Regan & Lucy George

Midlands firm appointshead of real estate development

Charles Russell Speechlys—Libby Elliott

Charles Russell Speechlys—Libby Elliott

Corporate, restructuring and insolvency offering grows with partner hire

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll