Graham McPhie reports on resolving the tension between bankruptcy & pension rights
- Horton v Henry [2016] EWCA Civ 989, [2016] All ER (D) 50 (Oct) has settled a conflict between two High Court decisions regarding whether a trustee in bankruptcy was entitled to force a bankrupt to take a pension not yet in payment.
In Raithatha v Williamson (a bankrupt) [2012] EWHC 909 (Ch), [2012] 3 All ER 1028 the High Court determined that a bankrupt’s entitlement to compel payment of pension benefits fell to be included in the assessment of his income within the meaning of s 310(7) of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986).
The High Court in Henry v Horton [2014] EWHC 4209 (Ch), [2014] All ER (D) 193 (Dec) declined to follow Raithatha on the grounds that it was wrong on the effect of s 310(7).
The Court of Appeal formulated the question as follows: “Does a pension entitlement in respect of which a bankrupt has a present right to elect to draw down payment (but which
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=961ae4db_1)
95ca96e3d47f4eff8d147c4f0df17c77.tmb-mov69x69.png?sfvrsn=3db5d86b_1)
