header-logo header-logo

05 February 2009
Issue: 7355 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

A conflict of law

The sharia law debate rumbles on. Thom Dyke reports

This time last year saw headlines in both the legal and popular press dominated by the issue of sharia law in the UK. The controversy was sparked off by a speech made in February by the Archbishop of Canterbury, suggesting the adoption of certain aspects of sharia was “unavoidable”. The resulting barrage of criticism precluded almost all sensible discussion of the issues. However, now the media furore has subsided, where does the sharia debate stand?

The speech itself
In the aftermath of the Archbishop’s speech, most critics chose to ignore the detailed substance of his argument, in favour of attacking any moves which would give a greater role for Islamic law. Others took the easier approach of constructing their own straw man versions of the argument. Sayeeda Warsi, the Conservatives’s shadow community cohesion minister, said: “Williams seems to be suggesting that there should be two systems of law, running alongside each other, almost parallel, and for people to be offered the choice of opting into one

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

NEWS
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
Lawyers have been asked for their views on proposals to change the penalties for assaulting a police officer
back-to-top-scroll