header-logo header-logo

05 February 2009
Issue: 7355 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

A conflict of law

The sharia law debate rumbles on. Thom Dyke reports

This time last year saw headlines in both the legal and popular press dominated by the issue of sharia law in the UK. The controversy was sparked off by a speech made in February by the Archbishop of Canterbury, suggesting the adoption of certain aspects of sharia was “unavoidable”. The resulting barrage of criticism precluded almost all sensible discussion of the issues. However, now the media furore has subsided, where does the sharia debate stand?

The speech itself
In the aftermath of the Archbishop’s speech, most critics chose to ignore the detailed substance of his argument, in favour of attacking any moves which would give a greater role for Islamic law. Others took the easier approach of constructing their own straw man versions of the argument. Sayeeda Warsi, the Conservatives’s shadow community cohesion minister, said: “Williams seems to be suggesting that there should be two systems of law, running alongside each other, almost parallel, and for people to be offered the choice of opting into one

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll