header-logo header-logo

14 July 2011
Issue: 7474 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Conflict of laws

NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina [2011] UKSC 31, [2011] All ER (D) 44 (Jul)

Section 31 of the Civil Jurisdictions and Judgments Act 1982 was the means by which the UK’s legislator achieved, for the first time, a comprehensive and coherent treatment of the issue of state immunity in respect of foreign judgments. Adopting a narrow interpretation, the drafters of the State Immunity Act 1978 or Parliament had not contemplated that s 3(1)(a) of that Act had in mind that it would or should apply to a foreign judgment against a foreign state.

Section 31 of the 1982 Act provided comprehensively for the recognition and enforcement of the foreign judgments to which it applied. A foreign judgment against a state would be capable of enforcement in England if both of the following conditions were fulfilled: first, that the foreign court would have had jurisdiction if it had applied the UK rules on sovereign immunity set out in ss 2 to 11 of the 1978 Act, the effect of which was that a state was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll