header-logo header-logo

Conflict of laws—Bankruptcy—Order of foreign bankruptcy court

02 September 2010
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Rubin and another v Eurofinance SA and others [2010] EWCA Civ 895, [2010] All ER (D) 358 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division,Ward, Wilson LJJ and Henderson J, 30 July 2010

Foreign bankruptcy proceedings, including adversary proceedings, should be recognised as a foreign main proceeding in accordance with the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency as set out in Sch 1 to the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006. The appointment therein of the receivers as foreign representatives within the meaning of art 2(j) of the Model Law should be similarly recognised.

Tom Smith (instructed by Dundas & Wilson LLP) for the receivers. Marcus Staff (instructed by Brown Rudnick LLP) for the defendants.

The proceedings concerned The Consumers Trust (TCT) created in March 2002 in order to carry on a sales promotion scheme in the USA and Canada. The trust profitably operated a voucher scheme until subjected to consumer protection proceedings. The first respondent settlor appointed the applicants, as the receivers and managers of TCT, to institute New York

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll