header-logo header-logo

09 February 2012
Issue: 7500 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Conflict of laws—Insolvency—Foreign administrator

Schmitt v Deichmann and others [2012] EWHC 62 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 177 (Jan)

Chancery Division, Proudman J, 23 Jan 2012

The court has an inherent common law jurisdiction to permit the statutory power under s 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) to be applied to a foreign administrator not falling within the express scope of the statute. 

David Marks QC (instructed by Dewey & Le Boeuf LLP) for the appellant. David Wolfson QC and Adam Rushworth (instructed by Kennedys Solicitors) for the respondents.

Phoenix was a German company carrying on business in Germany and elsewhere pursuant to contracts with individuals, including the appellants. Phoenix held all the money collected from investors in a single managed account. Phoenix represented that it was a trustee of the money which would be invested in the futures market. The claimant, the German administrator of Phoenix, alleged that the enterprise was loss-making from the start; all or most of the money invested was used to cover existing overheads and to pay fictitious

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll