header-logo header-logo

Conflict of laws—Insolvency—Foreign administrator

09 February 2012
Issue: 7500 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Schmitt v Deichmann and others [2012] EWHC 62 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 177 (Jan)

Chancery Division, Proudman J, 23 Jan 2012

The court has an inherent common law jurisdiction to permit the statutory power under s 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) to be applied to a foreign administrator not falling within the express scope of the statute. 

David Marks QC (instructed by Dewey & Le Boeuf LLP) for the appellant. David Wolfson QC and Adam Rushworth (instructed by Kennedys Solicitors) for the respondents.

Phoenix was a German company carrying on business in Germany and elsewhere pursuant to contracts with individuals, including the appellants. Phoenix held all the money collected from investors in a single managed account. Phoenix represented that it was a trustee of the money which would be invested in the futures market. The claimant, the German administrator of Phoenix, alleged that the enterprise was loss-making from the start; all or most of the money invested was used to cover existing overheads and to pay fictitious

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll