header-logo header-logo

09 September 2010
Issue: 7432 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Conflict of laws—Jurisdiction—Challenge to jurisdiction

Deutsche Bank AG v Sebastian Holdings Inc [2010] EWCA Civ 998, [2010] All ER (D) 98 (Aug)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Mummery, Thomas and Pitchford LJJ, 20 August 2010

It is clear that in construing a jurisdiction clause, a broad and purposive construction has to be followed. When looking at a complex series of agreements, it is necessary to construe an agreement which is part of a series of agreements by taking into account the overall scheme of the agreements and reading sentences and phrases in the context of that overall scheme.

David Foxton QC and Sonia Tolaney (instructed by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer) for the bank. Tim Lord QC and Jasbir Dhillon (instructed by Travers Smith LLP) for the defendant.

The claimant was a global bank (the bank) incorporated in Germany and with offices worldwide. The defendant was a company incorporated in the Turks and Caicos Islands. In 2004, the defendant became a customer of the bank. In 2006 and 2008, it entered into a series of agreements with the bank for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll