header-logo header-logo

Charity trustees & conflict of interest

27 September 2024 / Liz Brownsell
Issue: 8087 / Categories: Features , Charities
printer mail-detail
190808
Public confidence in charity trustees is under the microscope. Liz Brownsell examines the Charity Commission’s powers & how not to fall foul of them
  • With the Charity Commission now flexing its trustee disqualification powers, as recently seen in relation to the Captain Tom Foundation, conflict of interest and public trust in charities have been the subject of media headlines.
  • In Goodband v Charity Commission, a disqualified charity trustee challenged the decision. The case gives a useful insight into how easily conflicts of interest can emerge and how they can be avoided.

One of the core statutory objectives of the Charity Commission for England and Wales is to increase public trust and confidence in charities, and its regulatory priorities are often driven by the issues that matter most to the public. This can be seen acutely in the context of statutory inquiries and trustee disqualification cases.

Research shows that the public care most about how charities spend their funds, and this is borne out in the stories that tend to hit

To access this full article please fill the form below.
All fields are mandatory unless marked as 'Optional'.
If you already a subscriber to New Law Journal, please login here

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll