header-logo header-logo

Conflicting rights

31 May 2007 / Julian Samiloff
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Julian Samiloff considers whether Irish abortion law breaches human rights

Miss D, aged 17, was pregnant and in the care of Ireland’s social services, Health Service Executive (HSE). Following a routine hospital scan she discovered that the foetus was suffering from a fatal abnormality and she decided that she wanted an abortion. Although abortion is lawful in Ireland, it is legal only on the basis that in the absence of a termination the life of the mother will be put in jeopardy, and though a provision exists in the Irish constitution to allow for legislation on this issue none has thus far been enacted.

The HSE, anticipating that D would leave Eire and go to the UK to get an abortion, asked the police to arrest D if she tried to leave the country and also asked the Irish passport office not to issue a passport. D challenged this action by judicial review. The HSE argued at first that it could not get involved in D’s plan to terminate her pregnancy and also that by Ireland’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll