header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
31 May 2007 / Julian Samiloff
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Conflicting rights

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Julian Samiloff considers whether Irish abortion law breaches human rights

Miss D, aged 17, was pregnant and in the care of Ireland’s social services, Health Service Executive (HSE). Following a routine hospital scan she discovered that the foetus was suffering from a fatal abnormality and she decided that she wanted an abortion. Although abortion is lawful in Ireland, it is legal only on the basis that in the absence of a termination the life of the mother will be put in jeopardy, and though a provision exists in the Irish constitution to allow for legislation on this issue none has thus far been enacted.

The HSE, anticipating that D would leave Eire and go to the UK to get an abortion, asked the police to arrest D if she tried to leave the country and also asked the Irish passport office not to issue a passport. D challenged this action by judicial review. The HSE argued at first that it could not get involved in D’s plan to terminate her pregnancy and also that by Ireland’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll