header-logo header-logo

10 July 2019
Issue: 7848 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family , Pensions
printer mail-detail

Confusion about pensions & divorce highlighted

Many individuals who divorce are losing out due to a lack of understanding of pensions, lawyers have warned.

Last week the Nuffield Foundation’s Pension Advisory Group (PAG) published 'A Guide to the Treatment of Pensions on Divorce' for family lawyers and the public. PAG is composed of judges, lawyers, actuaries, financial planners and academics.

Withers partner James Copson, a co-author of the guide, said: ‘Before pension sharing was introduced in 2000 many women lost out on divorce because they could not share their husband's pension.  

‘In the years since a lack of understanding of the complex issue of how to deal with pensions on divorce has meant that they have lost out once more. What worries me is that, when the waves roll back to uncover the true financial impact of the profession's failings on the subject of pension sharing, there will be a tidal swell of negligence cases against lawyers. 

‘Very few family lawyers really get to grips with the true value of a couple's pensions both at the outset and when negotiating financial awards.’

Meanwhile, the Law Society has called on the government to cut the current £550 court fee for divorce applications.

Giving its written evidence to the bill committee on the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill, the society said the fee added an extra financial hurdle to what was already a costly process. Law Society president Simon Davis said: ‘The government’s new online divorce system will cut the cost of administration for the courts and this should be reflected in application fees.’

The Bill introduces ‘no fault’ divorce, the option to file a joint divorce petition and a 26-week notice period instead of the current two- or five-year separation period.

Issue: 7848 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family , Pensions
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll