header-logo header-logo

Confusion about pensions & divorce highlighted

10 July 2019
Issue: 7848 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family , Pensions
printer mail-detail
Many individuals who divorce are losing out due to a lack of understanding of pensions, lawyers have warned.

Last week the Nuffield Foundation’s Pension Advisory Group (PAG) published 'A Guide to the Treatment of Pensions on Divorce' for family lawyers and the public. PAG is composed of judges, lawyers, actuaries, financial planners and academics.

Withers partner James Copson, a co-author of the guide, said: ‘Before pension sharing was introduced in 2000 many women lost out on divorce because they could not share their husband's pension.  

‘In the years since a lack of understanding of the complex issue of how to deal with pensions on divorce has meant that they have lost out once more. What worries me is that, when the waves roll back to uncover the true financial impact of the profession's failings on the subject of pension sharing, there will be a tidal swell of negligence cases against lawyers. 

‘Very few family lawyers really get to grips with the true value of a couple's pensions both at the outset and when negotiating financial awards.’

Meanwhile, the Law Society has called on the government to cut the current £550 court fee for divorce applications.

Giving its written evidence to the bill committee on the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill, the society said the fee added an extra financial hurdle to what was already a costly process. Law Society president Simon Davis said: ‘The government’s new online divorce system will cut the cost of administration for the courts and this should be reflected in application fees.’

The Bill introduces ‘no fault’ divorce, the option to file a joint divorce petition and a 26-week notice period instead of the current two- or five-year separation period.

Issue: 7848 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family , Pensions
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll