header-logo header-logo

10 July 2019
Issue: 7848 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family , Pensions
printer mail-detail

Confusion about pensions & divorce highlighted

Many individuals who divorce are losing out due to a lack of understanding of pensions, lawyers have warned.

Last week the Nuffield Foundation’s Pension Advisory Group (PAG) published 'A Guide to the Treatment of Pensions on Divorce' for family lawyers and the public. PAG is composed of judges, lawyers, actuaries, financial planners and academics.

Withers partner James Copson, a co-author of the guide, said: ‘Before pension sharing was introduced in 2000 many women lost out on divorce because they could not share their husband's pension.  

‘In the years since a lack of understanding of the complex issue of how to deal with pensions on divorce has meant that they have lost out once more. What worries me is that, when the waves roll back to uncover the true financial impact of the profession's failings on the subject of pension sharing, there will be a tidal swell of negligence cases against lawyers. 

‘Very few family lawyers really get to grips with the true value of a couple's pensions both at the outset and when negotiating financial awards.’

Meanwhile, the Law Society has called on the government to cut the current £550 court fee for divorce applications.

Giving its written evidence to the bill committee on the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill, the society said the fee added an extra financial hurdle to what was already a costly process. Law Society president Simon Davis said: ‘The government’s new online divorce system will cut the cost of administration for the courts and this should be reflected in application fees.’

The Bill introduces ‘no fault’ divorce, the option to file a joint divorce petition and a 26-week notice period instead of the current two- or five-year separation period.

Issue: 7848 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family , Pensions
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll