header-logo header-logo

Consensus matters

29 May 2014 / John Pointing
Issue: 7608 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail
web_pointingi

Shariah & state law are linked in food law in complex ways, as John Pointing explains

Food law is of primary concern to Muslims. The distinction between that which is permitted—Halal—and that which is Haram, or forbidden, is of fundamental importance. But there is no consensus on what is permitted. Islamic jurisprudence is interpretative, based on religious scholarship and on various schools of thought that allow important differences to subsist regarding juridical categories. Shariah law is preoccupied with this complex and contested field, because religious beliefs are engaged with dietary rules and with related issues such as the non-stunning of animals prior to slaughter.

 

The preparation for sale of Halal food must conform to state law and regulation. State law in the UK is not specifically concerned with Halal foods, so how does Halal fit with state law? Shariah, or Islamic, law is not isolated from state law and neither is it at odds with state law. Probably many people living in the UK today experience some degree of fear or suspicion, or even hostility towards

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll