header-logo header-logo

29 May 2014 / John Pointing
Issue: 7608 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Consensus matters

web_pointingi

Shariah & state law are linked in food law in complex ways, as John Pointing explains

Food law is of primary concern to Muslims. The distinction between that which is permitted—Halal—and that which is Haram, or forbidden, is of fundamental importance. But there is no consensus on what is permitted. Islamic jurisprudence is interpretative, based on religious scholarship and on various schools of thought that allow important differences to subsist regarding juridical categories. Shariah law is preoccupied with this complex and contested field, because religious beliefs are engaged with dietary rules and with related issues such as the non-stunning of animals prior to slaughter.

 

The preparation for sale of Halal food must conform to state law and regulation. State law in the UK is not specifically concerned with Halal foods, so how does Halal fit with state law? Shariah, or Islamic, law is not isolated from state law and neither is it at odds with state law. Probably many people living in the UK today experience some degree of fear or suspicion, or even hostility

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll