header-logo header-logo

29 May 2014 / John Pointing
Issue: 7608 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Consensus matters

web_pointingi

Shariah & state law are linked in food law in complex ways, as John Pointing explains

Food law is of primary concern to Muslims. The distinction between that which is permitted—Halal—and that which is Haram, or forbidden, is of fundamental importance. But there is no consensus on what is permitted. Islamic jurisprudence is interpretative, based on religious scholarship and on various schools of thought that allow important differences to subsist regarding juridical categories. Shariah law is preoccupied with this complex and contested field, because religious beliefs are engaged with dietary rules and with related issues such as the non-stunning of animals prior to slaughter.

 

The preparation for sale of Halal food must conform to state law and regulation. State law in the UK is not specifically concerned with Halal foods, so how does Halal fit with state law? Shariah, or Islamic, law is not isolated from state law and neither is it at odds with state law. Probably many people living in the UK today experience some degree of fear or suspicion, or even hostility

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll