header-logo header-logo

12 September 2013 / Charles Lazarevic
Issue: 7575 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

A consequential loss

Could mis-selling in the derivatives market be the PPI equivalent for small businesses? Charles Lazarevic reports

Recently it has been suggested that the banks face claims in excess of £10bn as a result of the alleged mis-selling of complex interest rate derivatives. I have dealt with several cases where the consequences of these “swap” charges have been devastating on the business, with significant losses to the business-owners in some cases.

How has this situation arisen?

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), previously the Financial Services Authority, has conducted a review into the interest rate hedging products banks sold to businesses as a means of managing fluctuations in interest rates, also known as interest rate swap agreements (IRSAs). In the review, the FCA identified four broad categories of IRSAs sold: swaps, caps, collars, and “structured collars”. Some of the more complex products, particularly structured collars, speculated on interest rates and resulted in customers paying much more when the interest base rate fell below an agreed level, for no apparent benefit to the business. The FCA decided

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll