header-logo header-logo

09 May 2014 / Rupert Butler , Thomas Horton
Issue: 7605 / Categories: Features , Property , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Constructive feedback

web_bulter

A constructive trust establishes beneficial interests in property, as Rupert Butler & Thomas Horton report

The declaration of a constructive trust presents one of equity’s practical responses to determine proprietary interests where a claimant has acted to his detriment upon a promise as to the ownership of property. The effect is that the legal owner of the property must accept his role as trustee to the extent of the claimant’s beneficial interests. The recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Agarwala v Agarwala [2013] EWCA Civ 1763, [2014] All ER (D) 150 (Feb) fittingly restates the principles of how a constructive trust establishes beneficial interests in property.

Agarwala: the facts

Jaci Agarwala was Sunil Agarwala’s sister-in-law. Due to Sunil’s poor credit rating, he discussed with Jaci the purchase of a property in her name, which was to be converted into bed and breakfast accommodation. In April 2007, the property was purchased in Jaci’s name, who held the legal title, with the mortgage also in her name. It was agreed that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll