header-logo header-logo

Constructive feedback

09 May 2014 / Rupert Butler , Thomas Horton
Issue: 7605 / Categories: Features , Property , Commercial
printer mail-detail
web_bulter

A constructive trust establishes beneficial interests in property, as Rupert Butler & Thomas Horton report

The declaration of a constructive trust presents one of equity’s practical responses to determine proprietary interests where a claimant has acted to his detriment upon a promise as to the ownership of property. The effect is that the legal owner of the property must accept his role as trustee to the extent of the claimant’s beneficial interests. The recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Agarwala v Agarwala [2013] EWCA Civ 1763, [2014] All ER (D) 150 (Feb) fittingly restates the principles of how a constructive trust establishes beneficial interests in property.

Agarwala: the facts

Jaci Agarwala was Sunil Agarwala’s sister-in-law. Due to Sunil’s poor credit rating, he discussed with Jaci the purchase of a property in her name, which was to be converted into bed and breakfast accommodation. In April 2007, the property was purchased in Jaci’s name, who held the legal title, with the mortgage also in her name. It was agreed that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll