header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
16 January 2015 / Andrew Eaton
Issue: 7636 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

Consultation matters

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
andreweaton_haringeyboroughmap

What constitutes a fair public consultation following the Moseley judgment, asks Andrew Eaton

In the current climate of public sector austerity, public bodies regularly need to take difficult decisions to go further with fewer resources. In this context, the way in which public bodies make those decisions is coming under increased scrutiny, particularly in relation to tax and welfare.

The Supreme Court has provided guidance on how to conduct a fair public consultation process in R (on the application of Moseley) v London Borough of Haringey [2014] UKSC 56. Moseley is the first time that the UK’s highest court has considered the law on the duty to consult.

Background

As part of its wider public spending reduction agenda, the coalition government resolved in 2012 to abolish the national mechanism by which council tax benefits (CTB) were provided. Under a new regime, local authorities were required to design and operate replacement local schemes, known as council tax reduction schemes (CTRS).

The Local Government Finance Act 2012 introduced a requirement that local authorities publish and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Read All
‘Lost years’ precedent overturned
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
NLJ this week: Neutral counsel in a polarised age
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
NLJ this week: Short lets & sharp covenants
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
NLJ this week: Justice at the algorithm’s edge
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
NLJ this week: When ‘milk’ really means milk
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll