header-logo header-logo

23 July 2020
Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Consultation on economic crime levy published

The economic crime levy to be imposed on law firms and other anti-money laundering regulated businesses will be calculated according to revenue, with a threshold to exempt small businesses, the Treasury has said

In its Economic Crime Levy consultation, published this week, the Treasury proposed a levy based either on a single fixed percentage of revenue or fixed amounts based on revenue bands. The levy, through which the Treasury intends to raise £100m per year from the anti-money laundering regulated sector to fight economic crime, was announced in the March 2020 Budget.

Small businesses among the 90,000 businesses in the sector would be exempt, with three potential annual revenue thresholds under consideration―£1m, £5m and £10.2m. The consultation seeks views on what the levy will pay for, and how it should be calculated and collected.

David Rundle, counsel in WilmerHale’s UK White Collar Defence and Investigations practice, said: ‘The levy rests on the claim that the regulated sector itself stands to benefit directly. 

‘Transparency and accountability over how the funds are spent will therefore be critical and will no doubt be a focus of consultation responses.’

Simon Davis, president of the Law Society said: ‘Our sector devotes substantial resources to fighting financial crime.

‘We have strong concerns that a further unjustified burden will fall on a sector already under strain. We will be robustly engaging in the consultation process to ensure the profession’s views are well represented.’

The consultation ends at 12.15am on 14 October 2020. Find out more and take part at: bit.ly/2OT9Tzm.

Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll