header-logo header-logo

Consultation on economic crime levy published

23 July 2020
Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
The economic crime levy to be imposed on law firms and other anti-money laundering regulated businesses will be calculated according to revenue, with a threshold to exempt small businesses, the Treasury has said

In its Economic Crime Levy consultation, published this week, the Treasury proposed a levy based either on a single fixed percentage of revenue or fixed amounts based on revenue bands. The levy, through which the Treasury intends to raise £100m per year from the anti-money laundering regulated sector to fight economic crime, was announced in the March 2020 Budget.

Small businesses among the 90,000 businesses in the sector would be exempt, with three potential annual revenue thresholds under consideration―£1m, £5m and £10.2m. The consultation seeks views on what the levy will pay for, and how it should be calculated and collected.

David Rundle, counsel in WilmerHale’s UK White Collar Defence and Investigations practice, said: ‘The levy rests on the claim that the regulated sector itself stands to benefit directly. 

‘Transparency and accountability over how the funds are spent will therefore be critical and will no doubt be a focus of consultation responses.’

Simon Davis, president of the Law Society said: ‘Our sector devotes substantial resources to fighting financial crime.

‘We have strong concerns that a further unjustified burden will fall on a sector already under strain. We will be robustly engaging in the consultation process to ensure the profession’s views are well represented.’

The consultation ends at 12.15am on 14 October 2020. Find out more and take part at: bit.ly/2OT9Tzm.

Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll